Peer Reviewed Journal
AI for fracture diagnosis in clinical practice: Four approaches to systematic AI-implementation and their impact on AI-effectiveness
Authors
D. Loeffen, Frank M. Zijta, Tim A. E. J. Boymans, Joachim E. Wildberger, Estelle C. Nijssen
Citation
D. Loeffen, F. (2025). AI for fracture diagnosis in clinical practice: Four approaches to systematic AI-implementation and their impact on AI-effectiveness. European Journal of Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112113
Abstract
Implementation methods have a large impact on AI-effectiveness. These results suggest AI should not be considered for problem-solving or triage at this time; AI standalone performs better than either and may be a source of assistance where radiologists are unavailable. Best results were obtained implementing AI as safety net, which eliminates missed fractures with serious clinical consequences; even though false positives are increased, unnecessary treatments are limited.
Researchers in this portal